I'm currently writing script reports. Script reports are more crib sheets than actual reports though - the idea of giving plays a score out of five for effort and a grade for attainment is pretty disturbing. And when it comes to giving them a place in the class, well: somewhere under Shakespeare? A couple of directors (you may have heard of them) did recently sit an exam - but that's not quite the same as having to rank, say, Lucy Prebble, Bruce Norris and Jez Butterworth. Perhaps they would have done better if they wrote a play in lieu of an essay. Thankfully there is not yet an AQA exam in Playwriting: budding playwrights tired of the usual route of working through the fringe producing theatres could try this one, though. Certainly I feel like I could use it.
However, it is important to remember what you thought when you first read a play, hence the reports. Once you’ve been working on it for a while I imagine your opinion becomes somewhat biased based on the effort and time you’ve put into it: after all, if you spent two months putting a play together it’s probably in your interests to say it’s great, even if you were able to objectively evaluate it.
So a record of first impressions. Which is not to say that I won’t change your mind. I already have done so on numerous occasions about a couple of plays. Possibly it had less to do with the quality of the script report though, and more to do with the script itself. Which is how it should be. But it does make me wonder about why I bother with the reports in the first place.

